The Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: How Prosperity and Deprivation Are Found Cheek by Jowl in England.
In Nunsthorpe, residents live in properties only several yards from their wealthier counterparts in nearby Scartho. One 1.8-metre-high barricade literally divides the two communities in the town of Grimsby, blocking off roads and walkways that previously linked them.
“This is the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to associate with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from government statistics shows how deep inequality can run, sometimes over nothing more than a short distance of tarmac, a line of hedges or a wall. Decades of budget cuts and lack of funding mean a majority of councils now contain a neighbourhood ranking as one of the poorest in the country.
This geographical widening of poverty has led to a significant rise in the number of locations where disadvantaged and affluent residents find themselves living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the most deprived areas bordered one of the wealthiest. This number rose to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Divides More Than Land
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and painfully apparent. The barrier transcends being just a symbolic division; it creates very real problems for everyday life.
- The school commute that ought to take a quarter of an hour become an hour-long journey.
- Access to important services like grocery stores, schools and employment centres is hindered.
- The area can attract antisocial behaviour, with instances of litter being dumped over the wall and related problems.
“You try to have a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one resident, motioning at the rusted metal wall.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Challenges
Within Centre4, workers emphasise that support does not recognise postcodes. “Where you live doesn’t necessarily indicate your personal struggles,” said director a community leader.
Despite ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and sense of togetherness among its residents. Meanwhile, the neighbouring area ranks among the least deprived 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is mirrored nationally. The Stanhope area in Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of areas in England. It is closely bordered by large houses built in the early 2000s that are in the top 10% for employment and living environment.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s more community,” commented a long-term resident, aged 63. “You’ll probably find a lot of people over there never even talk to each other.”
The financial gap is clear: an typical family home costs about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while across the divide equivalent homes go for about £410,000.
Locals speak of a tangible sense of neglect. “This part of the community gets ignored,” stated resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “Over here our amenities have gradually disappeared, and the majority of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a picture of an ever more divided society, where prosperity and need are often awkwardly in close proximity.